
Whether delivering food or whisking people to work, shopping, and recreation, electric bikes have become a common conveyance in cities worldwide. Despite the increasing popularity of e-bikes, however, knowledge about their use patterns and effect on other transportation modes remains limited. A 2024 study offers insights—illuminating not only a shift in daily travel habits but also associated benefits. Among them: reduced congestion and car dependence, as well as enhanced mobility for older adults.
The study, published in Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, examined dual-mode households in the Jiading District of Shanghai, China, that owned cars and e-bikes. (Scooter-style models are favored in China, while pedal-assisted versions are prevalent in Europe and North America.) The research team chose the Jiading District because of the high modal share that e-bikes account for: 27 percent, second only to private cars at 33 percent. With its population of 1.8 million and high density, including compact shopping areas, the district also represents a microcosm of urban transportation challenges, such as parking and traffic.
Analyzing data from the Household Travel Survey, the researchers compared the basic travel behavior of dual-mode owners with those possessing only a car or an e-bike. They also employed machine learning to pinpoint trip distances where e-bikes are most likely to influence travel-mode choices.
Highlights of their findings include the following:
- Dual-mode households can reduce their car use by up to 19 percent, compared with those that rely solely on a car or an e-bike.
- Increased car choice begins at 3 miles (5 kilometers) and 0.9 miles (1.5 kilometers) for dual-vehicle and car-only owners.
- E-bikes encourage a greater variety of noncommuting activities for car owners.
- E-bikes facilitate commuting while also enhancing travel autonomy for older adults, who can cover longer distances without the physical exertion of pedaling a conventional bike.
- E-bikes have a minor negative effect on public transportation mode share.
“Dual-mode owners enjoy enhanced autonomy for local journeys, facilitated by e-bikes, while exclusive car owners have reported less frequency for those,” the study concluded.

The findings, reports Momentum magazine, could help transportation planners and policy makers worldwide encourage broader adoption of cycling as a key part of urban mobility. Beyond their maneuverability and emission-free engines, e-bikes promote activities—such as visiting friends or grocery shopping—that might otherwise require a car. “This flexibility is a game-changer,” notes Momentum, “especially in a district like Jiading, where narrow streets and scarce parking make cars less practical for local trips.”
While e-bikes present a viable complement to cars, their growing prevalence has generated a different set of transportation challenges. Safety and traffic concerns have prompted restrictions and even bans in cities from Beijing to New York, for example. Injuries—which have increased along with e-bike use—are typically more serious than with slower, nonmotorized bikes, report researchers in a 2020 Injury Prevention article.
Transportation agencies are working to improve safety while supporting expanding e-bike demand. Minneapolis, Minnesota, for example, integrates e-bikes with the public transit system, permitting them on buses and light rail, while Seattle, Washington, redesigned streets to accommodate electric and traditional bikes.